<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolution: Different Views</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.womenrespond.com/evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.womenrespond.com/evolution/</link>
	<description>A woman talks about her British upbringing, her American present, and her eternal future from a Christian perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:10:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamara</title>
		<link>http://www.womenrespond.com/evolution/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.womenrespond.com/?p=927#comment-211</guid>
		<description>I found Lee Strobel&#039;s book &quot;The Case For A Creator&quot; very interesting reading.  Lee interviews experts in various areas (physics, astronomy, biology, biochemistry and so on) regarding whether or not there is a designer/creator behind what we find.

Creationists are sometimes accused of having an agenda.  Perhaps.  Is it possible that evolutionists have an agenda?

Instead of starting with the assumption that a certain theory is true, is it possible to begin with &quot;real science&quot; and reach a substantial conclusion?  Some people think Strobel&#039;s book answers that question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found Lee Strobel&#8217;s book &#8220;The Case For A Creator&#8221; very interesting reading.  Lee interviews experts in various areas (physics, astronomy, biology, biochemistry and so on) regarding whether or not there is a designer/creator behind what we find.</p>
<p>Creationists are sometimes accused of having an agenda.  Perhaps.  Is it possible that evolutionists have an agenda?</p>
<p>Instead of starting with the assumption that a certain theory is true, is it possible to begin with &#8220;real science&#8221; and reach a substantial conclusion?  Some people think Strobel&#8217;s book answers that question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
